Scahill Law Group P.C. | New York Trial Attorneys

Earl v. Chapple 37 A.D.3d 520 (2d Dept 2007)

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) was granted. The Appellate Division affirmed.
Plaintiff’s chiropractor’s findings were not based on a recent examination, and plaintiff’s neurologist failed to offer contemporaneous findings.

Copyright © 2020-2022 Scahill Law Group P.C. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Read our Terms of Use)  Site design by Remote Resource
envelopephonemap-marker linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram