Scahill Law Group P.C. | New York Trial Attorneys

Tuba v. Hersch, et al., 219 A.D.3d 1461 (App. Div. 2d Dep’t Sept. 20, 2023) 

Congratulations to Gerard Ferrara for successfully opposing the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment in this case. This ruling reinforces the importance of addressing potential triable issues of fact, particularly in disputes involving serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102(d). The case was heard before Hon. Francesca E. Connolly, Hon. Joseph J. Maltese, Hon. Paul Wooten, and Hon. Helen Voutsinas. 

This case arose from a motor vehicle accident in which the plaintiff, Fanny C. Tuba, alleged that she sustained serious injuries. Tuba and her husband, suing derivatively, moved for summary judgment on the issue of whether she met the definition of a serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102(d). While the plaintiffs presented a prima facie case that Tuba sustained a serious injury under the 90/180–day category, the defendants, represented by Gerard, successfully demonstrated triable issues of fact. Specifically, he raised questions about whether Tuba's injuries were degenerative in nature and unrelated to the accident. 

The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's decision, holding that the existence of triable issues of fact precluded summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. This decision highlights the importance of presenting strong evidence to counter claims of causation and injury severity, as well as Gerard’s effective advocacy in achieving this favorable defense outcome.  

Copyright © 2020-2022 Scahill Law Group P.C. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Read our Terms of Use)  Site design by Remote Resource
envelopephonemap-marker linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram