Scahill Law Group P.C. | New York Trial Attorneys

Padilla v. Felson, 28 A.D.3d 530 (2d Dept 2006)

Defendant denied permissive use in this motor vehicle accident, but summary judgment was denied.  The Appellate Division reversed.

While Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 (1) creates a strong presumption that a vehicle is being operated with the owner's consent, that presumption may be rebutted.  Defendant owner left his vehicle in the possession of co-defendant’s auto body repair shop for the limited purpose of having repairs made.  At the time of the accident, co-defendant’s employees used the vehicle without the express or implied permission of defendant owner, to drive to a dealership to pick up parts.  

Copyright © 2020-2022 Scahill Law Group P.C. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Read our Terms of Use)  Site design by Remote Resource
envelopephonemap-marker linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram