Menu
Only published on occasion and it is 100% Spam FREE!
See News Example here.
Commercial contractor co-defendant appealed from decision, which granted plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a) to vacate a prior order granting co- defendants summary judgment, and granted reargument to ultimately deny co-defendant’s motion for summary judgment to dismiss claims based on respondeat superior.
The Appellate Division affirmed. Plaintiff was a sidewalk pedestrian who sustained personal injuries, when co-defendant’s vehicle struck defendant-respondent’s vehicle. Commercial co-defendant moved for summary judgment, but plaintiff was unaware of the briefing schedule, and served opposition untimely. Plaintiff moved to vacate based on excusable default, and for leave to renew and reargue. The Supreme Court granted plaintiff's motion to vacate and granted reargument, to deny co-defendant’s summary judgment motion on the theory of vicarious liability.
The Appellate Division found plaintiff demonstrated a reasonable excuse for default, due to the attorney's "calender service" never communicated the briefing schedule to counsel's office. Plaintiff also demonstrated a potentially meritorious defense based upon the commercial co-defendants being vicariously liable for the operator’s negligence. The Court rejected co-defendant’s argument that the operator was an independent contractor not acting in furtherance of the co-defendants' business at the time of the accident. “Issues regarding whether an actor is an independent contractor or an employee for the purposes of tort liability and whether an actor's conduct was within the scope of his employment are usually questions of fact for the jury”
Copyright © 2020-2022 Scahill Law Group P.C. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Read our Terms of Use)
Site design by Ralph Rosario