Menu
Only published on occasion and it is 100% Spam FREE!
See News Example here.
Plaintiff's motion to renew and vacate a prior order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment on default, was denied. The Appellate Division affirmed.
Plaintiff defaulted in opposing defendant's motion for summary judgment on the issue of lack of a serious injury pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102(d). Plaintiff did not move to vacate the default until nearly 1 year later. The court denied plaintiff’s motion due to plaintiff's failure to file proof of personal service in compliance with the order to show cause. Plaintiff then brought the motion to renew and/or vacate the prior order. The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s decision in declining grant leave to renew, “as plaintiff raised no new facts that would have changed the outcome of the prior motions, and failed to provide a reasonable excuse for failing to present those facts at the proper time” pursuant to CPLR 2221(e). “Renewal is granted sparingly and is not a second chance freely given to parties who have failed to exercise due diligence in making their first factual presentation”. The Appellate Division went on to alternatively consider the belated motion to vacate on the merits, and found plaintiff failed to provide a reasonable excuse for default pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1). “Counsel's vague and unsubstantiated claim that repeated requests were made for the doctor to provide the report did not amount to a reasonable excuse for the default, which had already occurred… While the issue need not be reached due to the absence of an acceptable excuse for the default… plaintiff also failed to demonstrate a meritorious defense to defendant's motion for summary judgment on the threshold serious injury issue.”
Copyright © 2020-2022 Scahill Law Group P.C. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Read our Terms of Use)
Site design by Ralph Rosario