Scahill Law Group P.C. | New York Trial Attorneys

Scahill Law Group Appeals

Found 94 Results
Page 4 of 10

Mehmeti v. Miller, 196 A.D.3d 475 (2d Dept 2021)


After a jury trial, plaintiff moved to set aside the verdict pursuant to CPLR 4404(a), or alternatively for additur, and plaintiff’s motion was denied. The Appellate Division affirmed.Following a jury trial, plaintiff was found to have suffered a permanent consequential limitation of use of a body function, organ, or member and awarded $50,000 for 4 […]

March 27, 2021


Penaranda v. Tesoriero, 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 3463 (2d Dept 2021)


Defendant’s summary judgment motion on the issue of liability, involving invocation of the emergency doctrine, was granted. The Appellate Division affirmed. Plaintiff alleges injury from a motor vehicle accident, when co-defendant’s vehicle crossed a double yellow line, struck plaintiff's vehicle head on in the opposing lane of traffic. The impact pushed plaintiff's vehicle backwards, into […]



Singh v. Sukhu, 180 A.D.3d 834 (2d Dept 2020)


Commercial contractor co-defendant appealed from decision, which granted plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a) to vacate a prior order granting co- defendants summary judgment, and granted reargument to ultimately deny co-defendant’s motion for summary judgment to dismiss claims based on respondeat superior. The Appellate Division affirmed.  Plaintiff was a sidewalk pedestrian who sustained personal injuries, when co-defendant’s […]

March 27, 2020


Grate v. Rodrigues, 179 A.D.3d 440 (1st Dept 2020)


Defendant’s motions for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) were granted. The Appellate Division affirmed.

March 26, 2020


Wade v. Giacobbe, 176 A.D.3d 641 (1st Dept 2019)


Plaintiff's motion to renew and vacate a prior order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment on default, was denied.  The Appellate Division affirmed. Plaintiff defaulted in opposing defendant's motion for summary judgment on the issue of lack of a serious injury pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102(d).  Plaintiff did not move to vacate the default […]

March 27, 2019


Joseph v. Kelly, 178 A.D.3d 1028 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)


Co-defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability was granted in this motor vehicle accident case.  The Appellate Division reversed. Plaintiff was operating a school bus, when the bus was involved in a three-vehicle accident.  Co-defendants moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability and serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law […]


Gray v. Air Excel Serv. Corp., 171 A.D.3d 1026 (2d Dept 2019)


In this personal injury action, both plaintiff and the defendant driver alleged the other was driving inappropriately and aggressively, including stopping suddenly, tailgating, and swerving. After the vehicles came to a stop, a physical altercation took place.  The defendant driver pled guilty to misdemeanor assault and disorderly conduct.  Plaintiff sued defendant driver, as well as […]


Kang v. Bhullar, 167 A.D.3d 726 (2d Dept 2018)


Defendant’s motions for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) were granted. The Appellate Division affirmed.

March 29, 2018


Haring v. Toscano, 162 A.D.3d 991 (2d Dept 2018)


Defendant’s motions for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) were granted. The Appellate Division affirmed.


Page 4 of 10

Scahill Law Group Appeals

Found 94 Results
Page 4 of 10

Malpeli v. Yenna, 81 A.D.3d 607 (2d Dept 2011)


Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was denied in this personal injury and wrongful death action. The Appellate Division reversed, and dismissed the action against defendant-passenger...

March 25, 2011


Madtes v. Scher, 54 N.Y.S.3d 588 (2d Dept 2017)


After a jury trial on damages, the jury rendered a verdict that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).  Plaintiff appealed.  The Appellate Division affirmed, finding the verdict was not contrary to the weight of the evidence, as conflicting expert testimony was presented and jurors are entitled to […]

March 27, 2017


Little v. Locoh, 71 A.D.3d 837 (2d Dept 2010)


Defendant’s motions for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) were granted.  The Appellate Division affirmed...

March 25, 2010


Leonard v. Elite Investigations, Ltd., 221 A.D.2d 322 (2d Dept 1995)


Commercial defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied, in this motor vehicle accident involving a denial of permissive use.  The Appellate Division reversed, noting defendant submitted sufficient proof to establish its vehicle was being driven without its permission...

March 22, 1995


Lawrence v. Palmer, 59 A.D.3d 394 (2d Dept 2009)


Plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment pursuant to CPLR 3215 was denied, and defendant’s request to compel acceptance of their late answer was granted...

March 25, 2009


Krmic v. Corrie, Index No. 33353/19 (1st Dep’t 2025) 


Congratulations to Gerard Ferrara for securing an affirmance of summary judgment before the Appellate Division, First Department. The case was heard before a panel including Hon. Dianne T. Renwick, Hon. Cynthia S. Kern, Hon. Anil C. Singh, Hon. Peter H. Moulton, and Hon. John R. Higgitt. This decision reinforces the strict evidentiary standards for proving […]

July 21, 2025


Krasnyuk v. Cocchi, 110 A.D.3d 852 (2d Dept 2013)


Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) was denied. The Appellate Division reversed.

March 26, 2013


Kopilas v. Peterson, 206 A.D.2d 460 (2d Dept 1994)


Plaintiff’s action was marked off the calendar on consent. The action then was stagnant for 17 months, when plaintiff then contacted defendant to restore the action. The Appellate Division reversed.

March 21, 1994


Kapoian-Trapani et al. v. City of New York et al., Index No. 517495/2018 (App. Div., 2d Dep’t 2025)


Congratulations to Keri Wehrheim for securing a reversal in the Appellate Division, Second Department, on behalf of defendant Parking Systems Plus, Inc. The plaintiffs alleged that Alexis Kapoian-Trapani was injured in a Brooklyn parking garage managed by Parking Systems Plus under contract with the City of New York and the NYC Department of Transportation. The […]

October 22, 2025


Kang v. Bhullar, 167 A.D.3d 726 (2d Dept 2018)


Defendant’s motions for summary judgment on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) were granted. The Appellate Division affirmed.

March 29, 2018


Page 4 of 10
Copyright © 2020-2022 Scahill Law Group P.C. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Read our Terms of Use)  Site design by Remote Resource
envelopephonemap-marker linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram