Menu
Only published on occasion and it is 100% Spam FREE!
See News Example here.
This is a partial transcript of the cross-examination of plaintiff's medical consultant. Dr. Jerry Lubliner is a favorite expert witness for plaintiffs. He is often called as a consultant, with no treatment given to the plaintiff. He is polished, sincere, exceptionally well-spoken, talented and extremely bright. He likes to show he is the smartest guy in the courtroom. A defendant can use that narcissistic trait to their distinct advantage on cross-examination. A jury may be charmed and impressed by the direct examinations, but on the cross, defense counsel can show his true colors. Take, for example, this recent exchange between Tom Craven of our office and Dr. Lubliner in Kings County before Judge Dawn Jiminez-Salta during a July 2017 trial on a high exposure case with $2.3 Million in coverage and 100% liability against the defendant.
The plaintiff had a laminectomy and fusion from L3 to the Sacrum in 2011. The plaintiff also had a total left hip replacement in 2011. The plaintiff had a right knee arthroscopy in 2012 and a total right knee replacement in 2015. The plaintiff also had a left carpal tunnel release surgery in 2013. The 60-year-old plaintiff was out of work for over 300 days post-accident. This case could have resulted in a verdict above the policy limits. The case settled for $375,000 based on the strength of Tom's cross-examination.
To set the stage, a jury should know the Doctor's experience in the courtroom and counsel must take the upper hand having the Doctor agree to answer the simplest of questions with a yes or no. Here, Dr. Lubliner could not concede that simple point and made himself look foolish from the start of cross-examination:
Q. In fact, you have testified in court more than 250 times, correct?
A. Over 30 years, correct.
A. Correct.
A. I can't answer that question the way you crafted it.
A. If I am able to, yes.
A. I can't answer that question the way you crafted it.
Q. You don't believe that he had a preexisting degenerative condition in his right knee; is that your testimony?
A. I can't answer the question the way you crafted it.
A. I can. You are not allowing me to.
A. I can't answer the question the way you crafted it.
Q. Do you believe that he had a preexisting degenerative condition in his right knee, yes or no?
Copyright © 2020-2022 Scahill Law Group P.C. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Read our Terms of Use)
Site design by Ralph Rosario