Smilardi et al. v. Persaud et al., Index No. 16289/2012 (Sup. Ct., Kings Cnty. 2025) Congratulations to Paul Duer for securing a strong liability defense verdict before Justice Joy Campanelli in Supreme Court, Kings County. The case arose from a 2012 multi-vehicle accident involving several defendants, including Mary Fountaine (deceased), Steven Maffei, Isabel Rosa, and Fitzgerald Degraff, with plaintiffs Daniel Smilardi and Dante Calise claiming significant injuries. After a full liability trial, the jury unanimously found that while both Fountaine and Maffei were negligent, only Maffei’s negligence was a substantial factor in causing the accident. The jury further found that plaintiff Smilardi was also negligent, and that his negligence was a substantial factor in the occurrence. The jury apportioned fault 60% to defendant Maffei and 40% to plaintiff Smilardi, assigning 0% fault to Fountaine and Rosa. The verdict fully exonerates Scahill Law Group’s client, the Estate of Mary Fountaine, from any causal responsibility in the accident. This outcome highlights effective trial strategy, clear presentation of evidence, and the firm’s continued success in securing strong defense results even in complex multi-party liability cases.
Rivers et al. v. Bengal Limo Service Inc., Index No. 1024192/2020 (Sup. Ct., Queens Cnty. 2025) Congratulations to Paul Duer for securing a defense verdict on damages in Supreme Court, Queens County, before Hon. Ulysses Leverett. The plaintiffs, Napoleon Rivers and Tiwannia Hutto, were represented by Lozner & Mastropietro. Despite the driver being precluded and extensive claimed injuries by Ms. Hutto—including shoulder surgery, spinal decompression, injections, and multiple diagnoses—the court returned a defense verdict. Paul’s victory was hard won, particularly given the medical complexity of the claims.
Westgard v. Mehta, Index No. 3223B303S (Sup. Ct., Suffolk Cnty. 2025) Congratulations to Anthony Graziani for securing a strong result in Suffolk County before Hon. James F. Matthews on a damages-only trial. The 60-year-old plaintiff alleged injuries that purportedly necessitated a shoulder replacement and sought $1.4 million in damages ($400,000 for past pain and suffering and $1 million for future pain and suffering). Despite the plaintiff’s high demand and emotional appeal, Tony effectively argued that a $150,000 award was more appropriate based on the case’s merits and prior evaluations. The jury returned a $200,000 award, well below the demand and consistent with the defense’s recommended range. This outcome reflects Tony’s sharp trial strategy, a well-calibrated jury read, and disciplined advocacy.
Pollack v. Progressive Insurance Company, AAA Case No. 01-23-0004-3776 (AAA SUM Arb. 2025) Congratulations to Dave Tetlak and Karen Johnson for securing a full defense award in this high-exposure SUM arbitration before Arbitrator Sally Rose Maiolo. The claimant, Shana Pollack, sought supplementary underinsured motorist (SUM) benefits stemming from a 2021 accident and demanded $275,000. Claimant presented multiple witnesses and experts in an attempt to prove both liability and damages, including her treating physician and husband. But after hearing testimony and reviewing evidence including Google Maps imagery, accident photos, and deposition transcripts, the arbitrator found the claimant “exaggerated and untruthful” and held her 100% responsible for the accident. Relying on Vehicle and Traffic Law §1143 and Second Department precedent, the arbitrator determined that Ms. Pollack violated her duty to yield when exiting a private driveway and failed to establish any comparative negligence on the part of the other driver. Congratulations to Dave and Karen for their strong case preparation leading to this clean win on liability.
C.B. et al. v. City of New York et al., Index No. 514239/2021 (Sup. Ct., Kings Cnty. 2025) Congratulations to Keri Wehrheim and Sam Amini for a significant procedural win in Kings County. The case involves claims brought on behalf of three minor plaintiffs alleging sexual abuse and inadequate supervision while residing in a group foster home. Plaintiffs sought to add SCO Family of Services as a party defendant, years into the litigation. arguing it was united in interest with the City of New York under the relation-back doctrine. SCO had originally been represented by separate counsel. Scahill LLP substituted in and moved to vacate the default and deny SCO’s inclusion. The court agreed, holding that plaintiffs failed to show SCO was vicariously liable for the City or shared a legal interest that would justify relation back. The court also found that SCO would be prejudiced by being added so late in the case. This outcome eliminates SCO from the action and sharply limits the claims moving forward, a strong result driven by strategic legal positioning and persuasive motion practice.
Gavilanes v. St. Francis Preparatory High School et al., Index No. 719701/2019 (Sup. Ct., Queens Cnty. 2025) Congratulations to Keri Wehrheim for securing a critical win on behalf of Rocklyn Ecclesiastical Corp., the real estate division of the Diocese of Brooklyn. The plaintiff, a construction worker, alleged serious injuries from a fall off an A-frame ladder while performing HVAC work in the gymnasium of St. Francis Preparatory High School. He brought claims under Labor Law §§ 200, 240(1), 241(6), and common law negligence. Rocklyn was not involved in the work and did not own or control the premises, but it held a right of reverter in the deed, meaning the property would revert to Rocklyn if it ever ceased operating as a Catholic high school. Plaintiff attempted to use this clause to impute “ownership” status to Rocklyn and impose liability. The defendant moved to dismiss, arguing that a possibility of reverter is not a current possessory interest and does not establish control over the premises. The court agreed, citing longstanding precedent from 1896 and 1911, and dismissed the claims. An opposite ruling would have opened the door to Labor Law liability for entities with no role in construction or site management. As such, this result protects not only Rocklyn in this case, but also the Diocese’s broader portfolio as many of its properties include similar reverter clauses.
Lobzhanidze v. 5874 Tire Corp. (Sup. Ct., Kings Cnty. 2025) Congratulations to Isaac Dana for securing a strong result in a high-stakes damages trial before Hon. Caroline Piela Cohen in Kings County. The case involved two plaintiffs, Giorgi Lobzhanidze and Lika Morgan, who both presented significant injury claims supported by multiple expert witnesses over the course of a two-week trial. In closing, plaintiff’s counsel requested $1.1 million in damages for Giorgi Lobzhanidze alone. Despite the demand and expert-heavy presentation, the jury awarded only $60,000 to Mr. Lobzhanidze and $20,000 to Ms. Morgan. Of those totals, Scahill's client was responsible for $45,000 and $15,000 respectively well below policy limits and a substantial reduction from the amounts sought. This result is a testament to Isaac’s skill in challenging inflated damages claims and controlling exposure in a challenging venue.
Lancaster v. Boutsis, Index No. 536799/2022 (Sup. Ct., Kings Cnty. 2025) Congratulations to Isaac Dana for securing a defense verdict on liability in a summary jury trial before a Kings County jury. The case involved a $0–$100,000 damages cap, and while the jury found that the defendant was negligent, they also determined that this negligence was not the proximate cause of the accident, resulting in a complete defense win, a great result for our client.
Pollack v. Progressive Insurance Co., AAA Case No. 01-23-0004-3776 (American Arbitration Ass’n 2025) Congratulations to Dave Tetlak and Karen Johnson for securing a full defense award in this Supplementary Uninsured Motorist (SUM) arbitration before Arbitrator Sally Rose Maiolo. The claimant, Shana Pollack, alleged serious injuries following a June 2021 accident and sought damages from a $500,000 SUM policy, citing cervical and neurological injuries and treatment from multiple providers. The respondent successfully challenged both liability and credibility. After reviewing deposition transcripts, medical records, and testimony, the arbitrator found the claimant’s account to be exaggerated and not credible, concluding that Pollack violated VTL §1143 by failing to yield the right of way. The arbitrator assigned 100% liability to the claimant and denied the claim in full. This $0 award eliminates what could have been $475,000 in exposure, a strong result reflecting excellent preparation and execution by the team.
Philip Galasso v. Superior NY Limousine Corp., Index No. 1057946 Congratulations to Paul Duer for securing a strong defense outcome in a damages-only trial in Queens County on behalf of American Transit Insurance Company. Despite the plaintiff’s claims of serious injuries requiring both an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as well as lumbar surgery, the jury awarded just $20,000. Paul successfully leveraged evidence of minimal vehicle damage and highlighted inconsistencies in the plaintiff’s account of a prior accident and injury, effectively undermining the credibility of the damages claim. This result reflects a sharp trial strategy and a disciplined presentation of the facts—an outstanding outcome in a venue where larger verdicts are typical. Congratulations to Paul on this excellent result.
Kelly Mena v. Mohammed S. Islam (1085819) Congratulations to Charles Mailloux for securing a defense verdict on the issue of liability in Queens County before Hon. Laurentina S. McKetney-Butler. The defense successfully undermined the plaintiff’s credibility by introducing social media evidence that contradicted her claims of being unable to work. With critical support from Chris Harris, the defense also located and produced the driver, who testified at trial and bolstered the case. This result reflects thorough preparation and strategic execution by the entire team.
Michal Romantowski & Nicholas Liakaris v. Khan Chudery (902806) Congratulations to Rich Brown for securing a strong defense outcome in Kings County in a summary jury trial. The jury returned a defense verdict as to plaintiff Michal Romantowski, awarding him no damages. Co-plaintiff Nicholas Liakaris was awarded only $7,000, a fraction of the claimed injuries. Both plaintiffs alleged significant injuries, including traumatic brain injuries, orthopedic damage, and ongoing cognitive issues. However, the defense was able to dismantle their claims through an extensive social media investigation revealing photos of international travel and activities inconsistent with their alleged impairments. This result highlights Rich’s meticulous preparation and effective trial presentation in exposing credibility issues and defending against enlarged claims.
Brayan Hernandez v. Ahmed Munir Salimi (5212V160K) Congratulations to Anthony Graziani for securing a defense verdict on damages in Suffolk County before Judge Farneti. The plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Dov Berkowitz, testified that two surgeries were causally related to the accident, but Anthony’s strategic cross-examination exposed key weaknesses in the claim. By challenging causation, highlighting inconsistencies in the plaintiff’s medical history, and questioning the necessity of surgery, Anthony effectively dismantled the damages case. Key moments included:
Casting Doubt on Causation – Anthony exposed the lack of comparative diagnostic films and alternative explanations for the injuries.
Undermining Medical Testimony – Anthony led the testimony to reveal that while MRIs are useful, they don’t always capture the full extent of an injury or differentiate between acute trauma and pre-existing damage, reinforcing doubt about causation.
Highlighting Prior Injuries – Anthony raised contradictions in the plaintiff’s medical history to weaken the claim.
Questioning Surgical Necessity – Anthony got plaintiff’s expert to concede that exploratory surgery can be performed without definitive proof of a problem.
2024 Defense Verdicts
Glenn Flowers v. Anil John (3206X270F) Congratulations to Rich Brown for a defense verdict on the issue of liability today before Judge Richard Velasquez in Kings County. Our client, the insured, maintained a primary policy with Farmers of $100,000 and an excess policy with State Farm, also $100,000. The codefendant had a $25,000 policy with Nationwide. Plaintiff was seeking a recovery of all coverage ($225,000). The jury found the codefendant solely responsible on the issue of liability, completely absolving our client. Rich took the lead on trial for another great result for the firm.
Samuel Moise v. Iyesha Nesbitt (19735M239) Congratulations to Tim Jones for securing a defense verdict on damages today in Bronx County before Hon. Veronica G. Hummel. The plaintiff alleged right knee and shoulder injuries, including surgeries for a meniscus tear, ACL repair, and rotator cuff tear, with medical expenses exceeding $100,000. Claiming lost wages of $26,000 from 400 days of missed work, the plaintiff sought $5 million in past pain and suffering, $150,000 in future medical expenses, and $10 million in future pain and suffering.
While the jury found our client was responsible for the accident, the plaintiff failed to prove a causal connection between the accident and the alleged injuries. As a result, the court dismissed the plaintiff's case with a defense verdict. This result highlights Tim Jones’ exceptional trial work, including a pivotal cross-examination of the plaintiff’s surgeon, Dr. Touliopoulos.
Michil A. Gadalla v. Khalsa 13 Inc (1063565) Congratulations to Isaac Dana for securing a defense verdict in Queens County before Hon. Mojgan Cohanim Lancman. The plaintiff had declined a $25,000 settlement offer before trial, and after a thorough defense, the jury returned a verdict in favor of our client. This result showcases Isaac’s exceptional preparation and trial advocacy.
Raymond Jones v. Martin Delgado Inc. (605125/2019) Congratulations to Gil Hardy for securing a defense verdict in Nassau County before Hon. Gary M. Carlton. The case, a State Farm matter, was resolved on the issue of liability in a summary jury trial with a $0 low and $300,000 high. This result underscores Gil’s strategic approach and attention to detail in trial.
Lenin Alvarez v. Bienvenido Franco (608828/2021) Congratulations to Jeff Baron and Carmella Antoine for securing a defense verdict on damages in Suffolk County before Hon. S. Betsy Heckman Torres. This case, an Amica Insurance Co. matter, resulted in a favorable outcome for our client and reflects the team’s thorough preparation and dedication.
Shunnu Piao v. Shawkat Hossain (1048667) Congratulations to Charles Mailloux for securing a defense verdict in Queens County on the issue of liability before Hon. Claudia Lanzetta. The plaintiff’s attorney declined a $25,000 settlement offer before the verdict. This outstanding result was achieved despite the challenges posed by a difficult client.
Ajaz Asgarally v. Michael J. Zelenetz (328192Q72) Congratulations to Paul Duer for securing a defense verdict on damages in Queens County before Hon. Nicole A. McGregor-Mundy. The case was tried in a summary jury trial format with an agreed-upon high/low of $10,000–$175,000. The plaintiff had alleged a left shoulder surgery and several collateral injuries, but had a notable pre-accident medical history, including a knee surgery from cricket. His involvement in cricket became a key turning point in the case. This verdict showcases Paul’s outstanding trial skills.
Derek Earle v. Grace Episcopal Church (CIC34565) Congratulations to Frank Scahill for securing a defense verdict on the issue of liability in Queens County before Hon. Timothy Dufficy. This case arose from a trip-and-fall claim in which the plaintiff alleged they tripped on the sidewalk while exiting a city bus near the church. This result highlights Frank’s effective advocacy.
Renata Basman v. Mohamed Tarafder (670552) Congratulations to Paul Duer for securing a defense verdict on the issue of liability in Queens County before Hon. Karen Lin. Despite communication challenges presented by our client requiring an interpreter, Paul achieved an excellent result, showcasing his ability to navigate complex trial dynamics.
Whitney Jones v. Daniel King and Brer Four Transportation Corp (326015P64) Congratulations to Charles Mailloux for securing a defense verdict on the issue of liability in Queens County before Hon. Timothy Dufficy, reflecting Charles’ dedication and effective trial strategy.
Miguel Torres v. SM Bahadur (1044757) Congratulations to Paul Duer for securing another win for American Transit Insurance Company in Queens County before Hon. Denise Johnson. The jury apportioned liability 60/40, but found that the plaintiff did not meet the serious injury threshold under New York State Insurance Law 5102(d). This result reflects Paul’s expertise in effective trial strategy.
Jessica Cleaning Services, Inc. (325K16516) Congratulations to Sam Amini for securing a dismissal in this case. Sam successfully argued a motion for a directed verdict, contending that the limited testimony provided by plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Wynierski, was insufficient to sustain the evidence required for the jury to consider whether the serious injury threshold had been reached. After extended deliberations, the judge agreed and dismissed the case, showcasing Sam’s courtroom expertise.
Daniel Allen v. American United Transportation, Inc. (507154/17) Congratulations to Richard Brown for securing a defense verdict on the issue of damages in Kings County before Hon. Richard Velasquez. Rich’s cross-examination of the plaintiff effectively exposed inconsistencies in prior deposition testimony and highlighted exaggerated claims about the severity of his injuries. This approach significantly undermined the plaintiff’s case, leading to a favorable verdict for our client and showcasing Rich’s witness examination prowess.
John McAvoy v. Tong Shen Trading Inc. (3202S568P) Congratulations to Rich Brown for securing a difficult defense verdict on the issue of liability in Kings County before Hon. Caroline Piela Cohen. The jury determined that the plaintiff taxi driver was 100% at fault. While the jury found negligence on the part of our driver, they concluded that it was not a substantial factor in causing the accident. This outcome is particularly notable given that our client’s truck rear-ended the taxi, highlighting Rich’s exceptional effort and strategic advocacy.
Denys Mukhin v. Olzhas Tokhtarov (524475/18) Congratulations to the team on securing a unanimous defense verdict in Supreme Court, Kings County, before Hon. Richard Velasquez. This case was tried on the issue of liability, with an agreed value of $75,000. Our client testified that his vehicle experienced mechanical issues and was pulled to the side of the road. The plaintiff, a passenger in the vehicle, alleged that the car struck a wall at 120 mph and spun out six times. After deliberations, the jury fully rejected the plaintiff’s claims, returning a defense verdict. This result is a great example of the Scahill team’s effective trial advocacy.
Gregg Brown, Alan J. Kelton, and Christoph J. Kelton (153831/2018) Congratulations to Eric Flores for securing a defense verdict in New York County before Hon. J. Machelle Sweeting. This case, tried in a summary jury format with a $0 to $100,000 parameter, addressed both liability and damages simultaneously. Our client, insured under a $250,000 primary policy and a $1 million umbrella, faced allegations of failing to yield at a stop sign. Despite this, the jury determined that our client bore no responsibility for the incident, delivering a complete defense verdict and demonstrating Eric’s advocacy skills.
Scahill Law Group is a prominent Insurance Defense firm on Long Island. We are seeking experienced and motivated paralegals and Legal assistants to join our team.
Essential Duties and Responsibilities:
Following is a summary of the essential functions of this job. Other duties may be performed, both major and minor, which are not mentioned below. Specific activities may change from time to time.
Provide efficient administrative support.
Assist attorneys in handling cases from inception to the resolution of the matter.
Draft pleadings, discovery demands, responses, motions, various correspondence to clients and adversaries, etc.
Assist in trial preparation and various discovery.
Mail, fax, E-File, or arrange for delivery of legal correspondence to clients, witnesses, and court officials.
Assist attorneys in collecting information such as employment, medical, and other records.
Receive and place telephone calls.
Requirements
· 3 Plus years of experience as a Paralegal with working knowledge of insurance defense and/or Personal Injury Law
Customer service skills
Knowledge of Microsoft Office Suite
· Attention to detail, organized, time management
Ability to work in a fast-paced, high volume firm
Job Type: Full-time – Hybrid Remote Work
Benefits:
401(k)
Dental insurance
Health insurance
Paid time off
Trial Attorney-Insurance Defense
Scahill Law Group seeks a full-time Trial Attorney with a minimum of ten years of experience with an insurance defense background to take over a full pending caseload. The attorney would be responsible for representing civil defendants with primary venues being the five boroughs of New York City, Nassau, and Suffolk in Long Island and the Lower Hudson Valley. The position would require the Attorney to analyze lawsuits, prepare pleadings, conduct depositions and attend arbitrations, conferences, motions, and trials. The candidate must be organized, a team player, and able to handle a high volume of court appearances, virtual or/and in-person while handling a large caseload.
RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE
Analyze complex lawsuits referred from Claims and prepare necessary answers and responsive pleadings.
Interface and develop a rapport with our clients, claim customers, and our office team.
Conducts depositions and attends court conferences, arbitrations, motions, and trials.
Participates as a trial and/or appellate attorney in matters of significant exposure and complexity.
Possesses excellent knowledge of rules of evidence and civil procedure.
Possesses excellent knowledge of all aspects of Automobile Litigation, UM/SUM, and Premise Liability Insurance Law.
Provides legal research, advice, and direction to Claims on cases of significant exposure and complexity.
Work independently in making decisions in file handling, communicating those decisions appropriately, and keeping the Legal Management Team apprised.
Adept at working in a paperless environment, video conferencing skilled and proficient in computer legal case management systems.
Maintain minimum billing requirements
QUALlFICATIONS:
Possesses a minimum of ten years of relevant litigation and trial experience encompassing liability and damages verdicts.
Fully licensed to practice law in New York State and admitted to Federal Court in the Eastern and Southern Districts.
Must be able to handle a large caseload of High Indemnity matters including reporting requirements, roundtables, and a moderate to a significant amount of trial work.
Have a comprehensive knowledge of motor vehicle, premises, UM/SUM, and subrogation claims.
ADDITIONAL KNOWLEDGE. SKILLS AND ABILITIES
Excellent written and Oral Communication Skills
Willingness to work within the established system while also looking to improve processes and procedures and able to be flexible in all work assignments.
Proficiency with computer software including current Windows Operating System, MS Word, MS Teams, MS Outlook, and ability to adapt to new programs.
Legal Case Management Program experience is a plus. LexisNexis/TM
Attorney - Insurance Defense
Full Job Description
Attorney – Scahill Law Group
Responsible for handling a large volume of assigned litigation cases from inception through trial and to ensure all internal case handling and reporting requirements are consistent with the Scahill Law Group Litigation Philosophy and Litigation Management Guidelines. Provide the highest level of legal representation for Scahill Law Group Clients and their insureds.
Essential Duties and Responsibilities:
Following is a summary of the essential functions for this job. Other duties may be performed, both major and minor, which are not mentioned below. Specific activities may change from time to time.
Answer summonses and complaints
Initiate and respond to written discovery.
Prepare and respond to motions before the court.
Prepare for and attend all court appearances, as necessary.
Prepare for [including written submissions] and attend arbitrations where appropriate.
Prepare for, schedule, and conduct depositions and examinations under oath, as necessary.
Minimum Skills and Competencies:
The requirements listed below are representative of the knowledge, skill and/or ability required. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
J.D. (Juris Doctor) Degree from an accredited US law school
Maintain appropriate licensing and educational requirements.
3 plus years of experience in insurance defense on behalf of an insurance carrier in any combination of the following areas: automobile liability, premise liability, liability claims and homeowner/premises,
Experience in all phases of litigation (including trials to verdict) involving complex, high risk and/or high exposure cases.
Possess a strong understanding of insurance law, including the laws and rules governing civil practice in the state of practice.
Ability to analyze legal issues and identify relevant case opinions and facts, as well as the ability to interpret laws, rules, and regulations.
Job Type: Full-time
Benefits:
401(k)
Dental insurance
Health insurance
Paid time off
Schedule:
Monday to Friday
Application Question(s):
Do you have experience in meeting hourly billing requirements?
Experience:
Insurance Defense: 3 years (Required)
Work Location: One location
Full Job Description
Primary Purpose:
Responsible for handling a large volume of assigned litigation from inception through trial and to ensure all internal case handling and reporting requirements are consistent with the Scahill Law Group Litigation Philosophy and Litigation Management Guidelines. Provide the highest level of legal representation for Scahill Law Group Clients and their insureds. Take ownership of any issue, problem, or error that could impact the company, policyholder, and/or loss participant.
Essential Duties and Responsibilities:
Following is a summary of the essential functions for this job. Other duties may be performed, both major and minor, which are not mentioned below. Specific activities may change from time to time.
Answer summonses and complaints
Initiate and respond to written discovery.
Prepare and respond to motions before the court.
Prepare for and attend all court appearances, as necessary.
Prepare for [including written submissions] and attend arbitrations where appropriate.
Prepare for, schedule, and conduct depositions and examinations under oath, as necessary.
Research and prepare post-trial motions and appeals.
Maintain current knowledge of applicable insurance law in the state of practice.
Minimum Skills and Competencies:
The requirements listed below are representative of the knowledge, skill and/or ability required. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions.
J.D. (Juris Doctor) Degree from an accredited US law school
Maintain appropriate licensing and educational requirements.
3-5 years of experience in insurance defense on behalf of an insurance carrier in any combination of the following areas: automobile liability, premise liability, liability claims and homeowner/premises,
Experience in all phases of litigation (including trials to verdict) involving complex, high risk and/or high exposure cases.
Possess a strong understanding of insurance law, including the laws and rules governing civil practice in the state of practice.
Ability to analyze legal issues and identify relevant case opinions and facts, as well as the ability to interpret laws, rules, and regulations.
Possess strong analytical and critical thinking skills with the ability to provide concise, practical advice to non-lawyers.
Possess strong verbal and written communication skills with the ability to write motions and legal prose with clear and cogent arguments.
Possess strong organizational and time management skills.
Possess strong skills in attention to detail.
High degree of initiative, mature judgment, discretion, and the ability to handle sensitive matters on a confidential basis.
Possess strong client relationship skills with the ability to resolve conflicts and empathize with insured clients.
Possess strong negotiation skills.
Knowledge of complex medical issues, particularly orthopedic and neurological, with the understanding of etiology, causation, and treatment of injuries consistent with motor vehicle and premises accidents
Proficient in Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, Outlook, PowerPoint)
Proficient in Westlaw software
Solid understanding of the insurance industry and organizational relationships of the company, including the functions of other departments.
Desired Skills:
Experience in Legal Files case management software
Calendar Clerk
Job Description
A calendar clerk at Scahill Law Group, PC, is part of a team of dedicated professional’s that can handle a high-volume calendar. Under general supervision compile, verify and schedule daily calendars for court appearances of attorneys and perform other administrative duties related to the Calendar Department.
Essential Functions
·Experience scheduling Depositions
·Knowledge and understanding of the various court reporting agencies.
·Confirming court calendar, including but not limited to virtual conference, motions.
·Experience using a calendar system, such as a case management system to enter and keep track of all appearances.
·Contact attorneys and/or other parties regarding changes to court dates, including adjournments and cancellations.
·Review calendars to prevent over-booking.
·Interact with court, clients and attorneys on a daily basis.
Skills
·Oral Communication: Ability to communicate effectively with others using the spoken word.
·Organizing, Planning, and Prioritizing Work: The ability to arrange things or actions in a certain order or pattern according to a specific rule or set of rules (e.g., patterns of numbers, letters, words).
·Attention to Detail: Requires being careful about detail and thorough in completing work tasks.
·Time Management: Ability to manage one’s own time and utilize available work time to organize and complete work within given deadlines.
·Adaptability: Ability to adapt to change in the workplace.
·Dependability: Requires being reliable, responsible, dependable, and fulfilling obligations.