Scahill Law Group P.C. Logo

Only published on occasion and it is 100% Spam FREE!
See News Example here.

Smith v. Pottery King, 125 A.D.3d 753 (2d Dept 2015)

Categories  , ,

Defendant’s motion for dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) was denied. The Appellate Division reversed.
Co-defendant was the driver for commercial co-defendant, and an employee of a corporation in which defendant was a principal. Co-defendant struck plaintiff’s vehicle, while driving in the scope of his employment. Plaintiff brought suit against commercial defendant, and subsequently brought claims directly against individual defendant, under the theory of respondeat superior and negligent hiring, training, and supervision. Even giving plaintiff all favorable inferences as to the truth in the allegations of the complaint, the reflected co-defendant operator was an employee of the commercial co-defendant. Individual defendant was merely a principal, and not an employee of the commercial co-defendant, and co-defendant operator was acting within his employment for the commercial co-defendant.

Small logo
Scahill Law Group P.C.
1065 Stewart Avenue, Suite 210
Bethpage, NY 11714
(516) 294-5200
(516) 873-6229

Copyright © 2020-2022 Scahill Law Group P.C. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Read our Terms of Use)
Site design by Ralph Rosario

crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram