Only published on occasion and it is 100% Spam FREE! See News Example here.

Dr. Sanford Wert is an orthopedic surgeon we also see frequently on our files. Disputing a claim with a knee or shoulder surgery requires a well thought out cross-examination. How do we prove to a jury the plaintiff's claims of a knee injury which required surgery has no factual basis? Review the cross-examination attached by Charles Mailloux of our firm in a Queen's case, Keumok Han v. Spyridon Spetsieris (707898/17) from October 2019 where Dr. Wert claimed a motor vehicle accident caused a torn meniscus requiring surgery. It is hard to conceive a better result than the admissions received in this case.  On Cross-Examination, Dr. Wert was confronted with the following: 

Q. Would it be fair to say that the three indications for surgery are a complaint of pain, a positive diagnostic finding, and a failure of conservative treatment?
A. Yes, that's reasonable.
Q. Reviewing your report, could you describe what your findings were with regard to swelling?
A. No mention of swelling, just range of motion, and certain tests.
Q. What about testing? You performed specific tests on the Plaintiff's left knee?
A. Yes.
Q. And one of those tests that you did was a McMurray's test?
A. Yes.
Q. And a McMurray's test, correct me if I'm wrong, Doctor, is a test that can be used to identify a tear in an individual's  meniscus; is that correct?
A. Yes.
Q. And what were your findings for your McMurray's test performed on the Plaintiff on September 28, 2016?
A. Negative.
Q. You also performed an anterior drawer test; is that correct?A. Yes.
Q. Could you describe for the jury what that test was?
A. Anterior drawer is a test where you flex the knee to 90 degrees and try to pull the lower leg forward.
Q. And what were your findings on that exam?
A. That was negative.
Q. You also did a Lachman's test on the Plaintiff's left knee that day?
A. Yes.
Q. What were your findings on that test?
A. That was negative.
Q. What does Lachman's test test?
A. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament.
Q. You also did a valgus instability test?
A. Yes.
Q. And a varus instability test, correct?
A. Yes.A. They were negative.
Q. But what are you using that test for?
A. Ligaments. Medial and lateral collateral ligaments.
Q. So those tests that you did, would it be fair to say that they were aimed at looking into every part of the Plaintiff's knee in order to see if something was going on clinically?
A. Yes.
Q. And you didn't have any findings, any positive findings at all upon your examination of the Plaintiff's knee when she  first saw you, correct?
A. Correct.
Q. Would it be fair to say that if the Plaintiff was responding well to conservative treatment that she would not be  a candidate for surgery; is that correct?
A. Yes.
Q. Now, would it be fair to say when we look at the indications of surgery on September 28, 2016, Ms. Han was not a candidate for surgery to her left knee?
A. Correct.
Q. So the Plaintiff on September 28, 2016, was not a candidate for surgery, and then you performed surgery without even a further evaluation, correct?
A. Correct.


Read more here.

https://scahillpc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Decision-Grate-v-Rodriguez.pdf

Charles S Mailloux, Esq.
Charles S Mailloux, Esq.

Charles Mailloux, Esq. obtained a defense verdict on damages on December 13, 2019, in Civil Court, Bronx County, before Judge Fidel Gomez in Rafael Sanchez v. Tristan Hall (Index No. 300098/19).

Thomas R. Craven, Jr., Esq.
Thomas R. Craven, Jr., Esq.

Thomas R. Craven, Jr., Esq. obtained a defense verdict on the issue of liability on December 10, 2019, in Kings County before Judge Lara Genovesi in Necehelle Stolzenberg v. Jordan Ajpacaja (Index No: 508882/16).

Howard Greenwald, Esq.
Howard Greenwald, Esq.

Howard Greenwald, Esq. obtained a defense verdict on November 27, 2019, in Queens County on the issue of damages before Judge Leslie J. Purificacion in Uingston Markes v. Fordham Management NY Corp. (Index No. 711193/16).

Zachary Nastro, Esq.
Zachary Nastro, Esq.

Zachary Nastro, Esq. obtained a defense verdict on the issue of damages on November 21, 2019, before Judge Lucindo Suarez in Bronx County in Jasmine Soto v. Michael Vargas-Quispe (Index No. 28025/16).

Zachary Nastro, Esq.
Zachary Nastro, Esq.

Zachary Nastro, Esq. obtained a defense verdict on the issue of liability on November 15, 2019 in Civil Court, Queens County, in Satish Kohli v. Richard Zaremba (Index Number: 350671/19).

Charles S Mailloux, Esq.
Charles S Mailloux, Esq.

Charles S Mailloux, Esq. obtained a defense verdict on the issue of damages on October 24, 2019, in Queens County before Judge Dennis Butler in Keumok Han v. Spyridon Spetsieris (Index No: 707898/17).

Small logo
Scahill Law Group P.C.
1065 Stewart Avenue, Suite 210
Bethpage, NY 11714
(516) 294-5200
(516) 873-6229

Copyright © 2020 Scahill Law Group P.C.
Site design by Ralph Rosario

chevron-downphoneenvelopefaxcrossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram