Scahill Law Group P.C. Logo

Only published on occasion and it is 100% Spam FREE!
See News Example here.

Diaz v. Tumbiolo, 111 A.D.3d 877 (2d Dept 2013)

Co-defendant’s motion for summary judgment was denied in this wrongful death action involving a motor vehicle accident, with leave to renew after completion of discovery.  The Appellate Division affirmed.

Plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle owned by co- defendant.  Co-defendant alleged the vehicle operator was not given permission to operate the vehicle. “Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 creates a strong presumption that the driver of a vehicle is operating it with the owner's consent, which can only be rebutted by substantial evidence demonstrating that the vehicle was not operated with the owner's permission”.  Co-defendant failed to put forth evidence in admissible form to sufficiently rebut the presumption that the operator was operating the vehicle with permission.  Co-defendant offered a post-accident statement to an insurance investigator, without proof that it was properly notarized. Co-defendant also sought to use a transcript of a plea proceeding wherein the operator answered “[n]o” when asked if she had “permission”.  The Court found the prior statement is not admissible under CPLR 4517, and moreover, the prior statement would only be admissible as an “admission by a party” only against the operator, not against the plaintiff.  As co-defendant failed to make a prima facie case, the sufficiency of opposition was not considered.

Small logo
Scahill Law Group P.C.
1065 Stewart Avenue, Suite 210
Bethpage, NY 11714
(516) 294-5200
(516) 873-6229

Copyright © 2020-2022 Scahill Law Group P.C. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Read our Terms of Use)
Site design by Ralph Rosario

crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram