Scahill Law Group P.C. Logo

Only published on occasion and it is 100% Spam FREE!
See News Example here.

Hamilton v. Hamilton, 112 A.D.3d 715 (2d Dept 2013)

In this child support proceeding, the mother's motion to vacate a prior order, which granted the father's objections to another prior order, was granted.  The Appellate Division affirmed. 

In this action, the mother moved to modify a prior child support order, to require the father to pay private school tuition of their child. After a hearing, the Support Magistrate ordered the father to pay 64% of the child's tuition and expenses.  The father filed objections, which were mailed to the mother at a certain address. The mother did not file any response to the father's objections, and so the Family Court granted the father's objections and vacated the Support Magistrate's order. The mother moved to vacate, and to dismiss the father's objections as untimely.  The mother stated she never received the father's objections, and only became aware when the Family Court served her with the order vacating the Support Magistrate's order.  The mother claimed the address the father’s objections were mailed to was not her address.  Her petition, driver license, and the stipulation of divorce settlement, all reflected a different address.  The father then acknowledged the “Petitioner did not receive Objections to Support Order due to server mailing to wrong address in error.”  The Family Court granted the mother's motion to vacate and reinstated the Support Magistrate's order.

“Family Court Act § 439 provides, in pertinent part, that “[a] party filing objections shall serve a copy of such objections upon the opposing party,” and that “[p]roof of service upon the opposing party shall be filed with the court at the time of filing of objections and any rebuttal.” … Here… “the father failed to fulfill a condition precedent to filing timely written objections to the Support Magistrate's order and, thus, failed to exhaust the Family Court procedure for review of [his] objections”… Consequently, “the Family Court lacked jurisdiction to consider the merits of the objections, and the father waived his right to appellate review”.

Small logo
Scahill Law Group P.C.
1065 Stewart Avenue, Suite 210
Bethpage, NY 11714
(516) 294-5200
(516) 873-6229

Copyright © 2020-2022 Scahill Law Group P.C. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Read our Terms of Use)
Site design by Ralph Rosario

crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram