Scahill Law Group P.C. Logo

Only published on occasion and it is 100% Spam FREE!
See News Example here.

Nasca v. Sgro, 130 A.D.3d 588 (2d Dept 2015)

In this action for false arrest, abuse of process and defamation, defendant’s motion for dismissal pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) was granted. The Appellate Division affirmed.
“A plaintiff cannot prevail on causes of action based upon false arrest [and] false imprisonment … if the arresting officers had probable cause to believe that [the plaintiff] committed the underlying offense”. Probable cause is a complete defense to false arrest and only requires information sufficient to support a reasonable belief that the offense was committed…. “[g]enerally, information provided by an identified citizen accusing another individual of a specific crime is legally sufficient to provide the police with probable cause to arrest”” Here, the complaint included a statement by co-defendant that she had an order of protection against plaintiff, the order of protection, and defendant’s statement that he observed plaintiff approach within a few feet of co-defendant, establishing that police had probable cause to arrest plaintiff. Thus, plaintiff had no claim for false arrest.
Movants were also entitled to dismissal of the abuse of process claim, since plaintiff’s own complaint and exhibits established the lack of “an intent to do harm without excuse or justification” through the employment of judicial process.

Small logo
Scahill Law Group P.C.
1065 Stewart Avenue, Suite 210
Bethpage, NY 11714
(516) 294-5200
(516) 873-6229

Copyright © 2020-2022 Scahill Law Group P.C. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Read our Terms of Use)
Site design by Ralph Rosario

crossmenu linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram