Menu
Only published on occasion and it is 100% Spam FREE!
See News Example here.
Congratulations to Chris Amato for a defense verdict on the issue of liability on July 6, 2016 in Richmond County before Judge Desmond Green in BECKY MORALES v. MIRJANA SCARSELLI (100391/2014).
About Chris Amato:
As Richmond County Team Leader, Chris is in court daily. His role is to stay on top of every matter whether it involves arguing motions, attending conferences or going to trial. He draws on the strong relationships he has with court personnel and attorneys to keep cases moving smoothly.
An accomplished litigator, Chris has successfully resolved numerous high-exposure liability claims. He has over 27 years of insurance defense experience as both in-house and outside counsel. His practice focuses on bodily injury automobile accident cases as well as some general liability matters.
Congratulations to Tim Jones for a defense verdict on July 7, 2016, in Bronx County before Judge Barbato on the issue of liability in CHRISTINE WILLIAMS v. DONALD CARROLL (300777/2013).
As Bronx County Team Leader, Tim ensures all cases are ready to go to trial. He monitors when they are likely to come up for trial, prepares witnesses and filings, and litigates many of the cases himself. He brings a great blend of experience to each matter. Prior to joining the firm, he spent 15 years working on the plaintiff’s side, which gives him a unique perspective on countering his opponent’s strategies and tactics. His background also includes working in-house at Hartford and US Fidelity & Guaranty as well as with other outside defense counsel firms.
Tim is a skilled trial attorney who relishes being in the courtroom and taking on opposing counsel. Educating juries and getting at the truth of what happened in a case are a big part of what he enjoys about being a lawyer. He also likes that every case is different and involves learning something new, whether it’s about medicine, physics, biology, human experience or another area. His practice covers a broad range of personal injury defense claims. Read full bio
Defense Verdict for Paul Duer: Congratulations to Paul Duer for a defense verdict in the case of ISMAEL ABREAU v. FORTUNE DONUT CORP.(2343/2014) on July 15, 2016, before Judge Ritholtz in Queens.
Paul is the Queens County Team Leader responsible for managing the firm’s busy court calendar. A skilled litigator, he has an impressive portfolio of defense verdicts on the issues of liability and damages. Paul thrives on challenge and he brings his competitive spirit to every case. His practice focuses on automobile accident cases and he handles all aspects from inception through resolution. Read full bio
Congratulations to Dave Tetlak and our No-Fault Team for a great result on an ATIC arbitration. The amount demand demanded, $80,994.83, was denied in its entirety. The relevant portion of the decision is below:
The only other relevant evidence with respect to the question of the timeliness of the bill is the "proof of mailing" referred to by the billing manager. The ECF contains a heavily redacted log sheet that bears a US Postal Service post mark of 3/2/15. I note that the billing manager, Mike Manzo, swore in his affidavit that he personally maintains the logbook and that all claims are mailed on the first business day of each week. 3/2/15 was in fact a Monday. 4/17/15 was a Thursday. The post marked page of the log book that was submitted was redacted so that only the fourth entry on the page is legible. The column on the far left of the page is headed "article number" and the visible entry in that column has the relevant information necessary to identify the claim that is the subject of this arbitration. However, the second column, headed "Addressee (Name, Street, City, State & Zip Code)", has the Respondent's name and address in totally different handwriting than that identifying the claim. I also note that the second column has ruled lines on which to write the addressee's information. However, on the single section of the log that is visible the first column, again in obviously different handwriting than the second, is not lined, at least suggesting the possibility that the entry was whited out and rewritten.
I find that absent a direct affidavit of mailing, the discrepancy in the handwriting and the appearance that the claim information may have been added, particularly in view of the fact that the remainder of the log page is redacted so that no comparison to other entries of that day could be made, the log itself lacks credibility and is insufficient to establish timely mailing of the bill in issue. Although not required, I find the failure of theApplicant to attempt to justify its late bill directly prior to filing for arbitration further calls the actions of the billing company into question. I find nothing in the telephone call of 4/17/15 to indicate that a bill was actually mailed prior to that phone call. I note that the degree of redaction was completely unnecessary to preserve patient confidentiality insofar as the only necessary redaction for each entry would be the patient's name and file/claim number. There was no reason whatsoever to redact any portion of the column listing addressees. I find that these overly extensive redactions render the log virtually useless in establishing mailing on 3/2/15. As such, I find that the Applicant is not entitled to any reimbursement due to having submitted its bill in excess of forty-five days after the services reflected in the bill were rendered and find that the remaining unaddressed issues are therefore moot.
Read the complete decision here.
Congratulations to Andrea Ferrucci for another Appellate Victory in Hartsuff v Michaels (2016 NY Slip Op 04020) decided on May 25, 2016 by the Appellate Division, Second Department. Great result and great work!!! Read the decision here.
Congratulations to Tom Craven for an outstanding result in Johnson v. Yang in Queens County (Index No: 703829/13). We thought we would share this very gracious thank you letter from the client. The impression this client was left with is one we strive to achieve for all of our clients. Great job Tom!
Read the letter here.
Copyright © 2020-2022 Scahill Law Group P.C. (Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Read our Terms of Use)
Site design by Ralph Rosario